On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > Recently, there was opened this ticket: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719647 > > In short, there are some issues with -doc noarch subpackages, which are not > precisely identical coming from different builders, due to embedded > timestamps. As it turns out, there is SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment variable > available in RDoc, which allows to specify the timestamp and therefore > workaround the issue. And I think this could be useful for our packages, > therefore I created this PR: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/47 > > It modifies %gem_install macro and sets the timestamp for each gem. Is there > any reason, why not merge this PR? >
It's probably better to use that variable along with having rpm's feature to populate that variable on. %source_date_epoch_from_changelog Y We should probably turn this on in redhat-rpm-config... -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
