Dne 19. 06. 19 v 16:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 19. 06. 19 v 16:49 Neal Gompa napsal(a): >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> Recently, there was opened this ticket: >>> >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719647 >>> >>> In short, there are some issues with -doc noarch subpackages, which are not >>> precisely identical coming from different builders, due to embedded >>> timestamps. As it turns out, there is SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH environment >>> variable available in RDoc, which allows to specify the timestamp and >>> therefore workaround the issue. And I think this could be useful for our >>> packages, therefore I created this PR: >>> >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/47 >>> >>> It modifies %gem_install macro and sets the timestamp for each gem. Is >>> there any reason, why not merge this PR? >>> >> It's probably better to use that variable along with having rpm's >> feature to populate that variable on. >> >> %source_date_epoch_from_changelog Y >> >> We should probably turn this on in redhat-rpm-config... >> > Ah, I was not aware there is something like this possible in RPM. That > would be much better to have this enabled by default. So are you going > to propose change in defaults?
Actually I went ahead and opened this PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/57 Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
