> >> I'd suggest against building Ruby 3.0 on F36+ > > Oh thanks. I missed the part. > > How about using openssl1.1-devel > > > Is it really available? I know there were some discussions in the > context of old Python support, but I was under impression that while > openssl1.1 is available, the -devel packages is not. > > So for modules, it could be actually an option.
Not sure about it. We need to ask the maintainer maybe at devel@. -- Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic See <https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/czech-republic-prague-to-utc> for the timezone. _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
