Dne 02. 11. 22 v 20:38 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 6:54 PM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
Good catch.
Here is the PR to the rpms/ruby rawhide.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/135#

Not surprisingly, RubyGems fail as well 🫤


https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygems?collection=f38
Okay, the rpms/rubygems is next after the rpms/ruby.


Thx



And looking at git updates, I'd be not surprised if also older Fedoras
get broken soon:


https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=git
The git 2.38.1 is on f37, f36 and f35 too.
Maybe it's better to push this PR commit to these fedoras too after
merging the rawhide PR.


Right, I have mentioned this in the PR but you are apparently on top of it. Great!

BTW if you have a spare cycles, please review the Rawhide changes which were committed after the F37 was branched. I guess they could be included into F37, but I have not checked (particularly the enabled package notes, not sure if the changes landed in F37, but my guess is that they have landed there). Thx


Vít

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to