> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=git
> > The git 2.38.1 is on f37, f36 and f35 too.
> > Maybe it's better to push this PR commit to these fedoras too after
> > merging the rawhide PR.
> >
>
> Right, I have mentioned this in the PR but you are apparently on top of
> it. Great!

OK. I will fix this issue and build on the old Fedoras too.

> BTW if you have a spare cycles, please review the Rawhide changes which
> were committed after the F37 was branched. I guess they could be
> included into F37, but I have not checked (particularly the enabled
> package notes, not sure if the changes landed in F37, but my guess is
> that they have landed there). Thx

It seems that the rawhide specific change below should work on Fedora
37 (and 36) too. I will backport the commit to the f37 too.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/c/588a4ae9f02928d7bedbcf46a739d36b0a76e632?branch=rawhide

The issue comes from the redhat-rpm-config and it was fixed in
redhat-rpm-config-210-1 fc36, fc37, fc38 (rawhide).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043092#c66

So, I will test by building the rubygem-nio4r package on the built
Ruby just in case. This is a step to verify the issue that you
reported on the Bugzilla ticket.

-- 
Jun | He - Him | Timezone: UTC+1 or 2, Czech Republic
See <https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/czech-republic-prague-to-utc> for
the timezone.
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to