I should also note that there is one interesting gotcha:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-mocha/blob/rawhide/f/rubygem-mocha.spec#_21

The issue here is that while `ruby2_keywords` is part of StdLib, we don't provide `rubygem()` provides for default gems. I think we should fix it, given that the standard library is more and more gemified and I'd like to actually encourage everybody to fully specify their dependencies. The only question is if there is any elegant way to do it.


Vít


Dne 03. 08. 23 v 11:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
The rubygem-minitest 5.19 landing in Rawhide forced me to update rubygem-mocha to the latest version to fix the compatibility. While it fixes the minitest compatibility, it also creates its own incompatibilities.

One of the is the removal of the deprecated `mocha/setup` file, which used to the standard entry point in the past. This namely breaks:

* rubygem-uuid: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-uuid/pull-request/1

* rubygem-rack-cors: https://github.com/cyu/rack-cors/pull/266

But also possibly others. Please check your packages and let me know if you need any help. Sorry for the breakages.


Vít

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to