On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 9:07 PM Pavel Valena <pval...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:31 PM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 17:16 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everybody and happy new year,
>>>
>>> Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
>>>
>>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111186668
>>>
>>> As some of you have noticed, there are issues with expired certificates.
>>> I have asked backport here:
>>>
>>> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20106
>>>
>>> Other than that, there does not seem to be anything surprising.
>>>
>>> As I have already mentioned elsewhere, I have reset the release back to
>>> 1. I have not tested the updates yet, so I'm going to give it a try. If
>>> that looks OK, I'll ask the side tag and we can move forward with the
>>> mass rebuild. I'll keep you informed.
>>>
>>> And as always, any feedback is appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> Hello, thanks!
>>
>> Already building it; for testing with `-1`. But so far I have failure on
>> aarch; FAIL 103/1871 tests failed
>>
>> FAIL 103/1871 tests failed:
>>
>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/ruby-testing/build/6848059/
>>
>> Seems like fibers and Ractors... will retry. Others have succeeded!
>>
>>
>> My build succeeded everywhere. Nevertheless, there were some reports
>> about issues with fibers (e.g. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20085).
>> So we should probably observe and if needed, apply some patch.
>>
>> I did a build from my EL9 specific specfile here:
>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jackorp/ruby-builds/build/6848355/
>>
>> It failed with a bunch of segfaults as well, it seems the issue is
>> reproducible on copr infra. The number of failed tests is the same as with
>> Pavel's build (103/1871)
>>
>> Actually, the hw_info differs for copr and koji. Koji is missing `paca
>> pacg` (I guess those are related to the mentioned
>> `ASFLAGS=-mbranch-protection=pac-ret`), though ssbs is present on both.
>>
>> My copr build hw_info.log.gz:
>> https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jackorp/ruby-builds/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/06848355-ruby/hw_info.log.gz
>> Passed koji build hw_info.log.gz:
>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6817/111186817/hw_info.log
>>
>> Also despite both of the infra are reporting the same Vendor ID and Model
>> Name, there are visually half the CPU flags missing on Koji compared to
>> copr.
>>
>>
>> Hoping that somebody is going to try the patch on my behalf (unless I hit
>> the issue myself ;) )
>>
>
> My second build hit 101 issues, similarly to the previous one.
>
> Running with the patch from issue 20085:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6850032
>
> So far so good. Commit:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/pvalena/rpms/ruby/c/7f32705242dd2b55e72d3e9e5eed0934e38ad043?branch=stream-3.3
>
> Btw. WRT rails, I'm removing byebug from `rubyonrails` comps:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/925 (orphaned 6+ weeks)
>

With byebug resurrected in my COPR; my rails test works fine with Ruby 3.3:

Log: https://gist.github.com/pvalena/47299184b16a3f81b6c954dca65dcc9f

Pavel


>
> Pavel
>
>
>>
>> Vít
>>
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>>
>> Vít
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm rebuilding the few remaining deps in my COPR repo. Hopefully, I'll be
>> able to test with Rails (dnf install ruby-on-rails....) soon.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pavel
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Vít
>>>
>>
--
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to