Dne 27. 11. 24 v 1:07 Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch via ruby-sig wrote on 2024/11/27 0:48:Currently the failures I feel difficult to fix are: * rubygem-websocket https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/mpb/build/8312136/ Due to https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20265 change,NEWOBJ macro is removed, then currently rubygem-websocket really fails to compile.For now I have no idea how to replace this macro.I can see just the `base64` issue. Does the NEWOBJ thing pops up once the `base64` issue is fixed?Sorry, I was completely confused. Actually this is rubygem-serialport . https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/mpb/build/8312122/
1) I have asked upstream for migration path: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20265#note-5 2) The question is if there is future in this project: https://github.com/hparra/ruby-serialport/discussions/77We have rubygem-serialport in Fedora due to rubygem-icaro dependency. However, this also seems to be dead. Maybe the most meaningful step ATM is to open ticket against rubygem-serialport with all the information and warning we are going to break the packages.
Thoughts? Vít
Regards, Mamoru
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
