Vít Ondruch via ruby-sig wrote on 2024/12/24 2:09:
Dear Rubyists,
This is likely my last update prior official Ruby 3.4 release. So here I am
with update to a11bb36316. The build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127139135
While the mini mass rebuild is churning here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/mpb.30/builds/
What I find a bit unfortunate that FESCo was not able to approve the change.
But I hope they'll approve in the ticket and we will be able to start with the
mass rebuild with the new year. Until then, please give it a try or better,
enjoy some well deserve rest.
See you in new year.
Vít
Well, looks like after
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/9e0eb9778d557ef59a541a65be658040951de5be#diff-1bc0d6e0a7ee599f3652ef78aa8bc9f7fc976d55362eef5f4442cfc4ce002c3f
(this is from:
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/8340 )
it seems that
$ gem install --document=rdoc,ri (in %gem_install)
no longer generates rdoc/ri documentation even if the above option is
explicitly specified...
(The above commit is after the commit you checked: a11bb36316)
So... how should we handle this? Revert the above change (in
lib/rubygems/rdoc.rb) or report rubygems upstream?
Regards,
Mamoru
--
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
