Dne 27. 10. 25 v 7:28 Mamoru TASAKA via ruby-sig napsal(a):
Hello, ruby-sig folks:Thank you for work for ruby 3.5: Vít Ondruch via ruby-sig wrote on 2025/10/23 21:14:Dne 22. 10. 25 v 18:23 Jarek Prokop via ruby-sig napsal(a):Hi everybody,It is the time of the year to look at upcoming version of Ruby. I am continually integrating the master upstream branch in my Fedora fork:https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jackorp/rpms/ruby/commits/ruby-3.5It currently contains RHEL specific bits as well. I am developing for both EL and Fedora from the same repo at the moment. I'll create a cleaned up Fedora PR (without RHEL bits) into the official repo later in development process.And here are some interesting bits from the new release so far:* Similarly to 3.4, the biggest change are the unbundled default gems. They are also kept in `bundled-gems` subpackage. I try to keep the file lists very similar to what would be the gem2rpm output.* Most notably, rdoc and irb were promoted to bundled gems.And just briefly looking at your mass-prebuild copr repo, it also seems that the Fiddle has been moved out:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jackorp/ruby-3.5-snapshot-rebuild/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/09716807-rubygem-ffi/builder-live.log.gzIOW fixing rubygem-ffi could fix several other components (I was looking at rubygem-activesupport initially).VítUnfortunately even if adding BR: rubygem(fiddle) currently rubygem-ffi testsuite does not pass(even ffi git head testsuite does not pass), I've filed: https://github.com/ffi/ffi/issues/1163
Thanks for digging deeper. I've subscribed myself to that ticket.
(Apart from the 2 tests failures mentioned on the above issue, 2 commits need backporting toFedora side rubygem-ffi)
If feasible and there is newer release then what is available in Fedora, I won't mind if somebody does rebase on my behalf 😇 whatever makes sense and is easier.
Another note is that Ractor#take removal affects some packages like rubygem-http_parser.rbhttps://github.com/tmm1/http_parser.rb/issues/85(and also rubygem-rmagick failed, which is already fixed upstream and I will backport:https://github.com/rmagick/rmagick/pull/1712/files )
Will this be common theme of this round? :) Vít
Regards, Mamoru
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
