Hi,looking into rubygem-sass failure, the difference seems to be in this backtrace:
~~~ --- <bez názvu> +++ <bez názvu> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ > e.backtrace =>-["/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sass-3.7.4-build/sass-3.7.4/usr/share/gems/gems/sass-3.7.4/test/sass/script_test.rb:11:in 'arg_error'", +["/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-sass-3.7.4-build/sass-3.7.4/usr/share/gems/gems/sass-3.7.4/test/sass/script_test.rb:11:in 'Sass::Script::Functions::UserFunctions#arg_error'",
~~~IOW there is additional context which was not there previously, therefore it is not matched properly and the original exception is re-raised here:
https://github.com/sass/ruby-sass/blob/7a50eae567260a23d3bbf4d5aaf1a76db43dec32/lib/sass/script/tree/funcall.rb#L311 This change likely comes from: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21543 Unfortunately, this change makes also some cases less obvious IMO: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21698Therefore waiting with the fix for now. In the mean time, I have orphaned rubygem-sass{,c}-rails in hope to get rid of rubygem-sass eventually (it is already more than 6 years after upstream EOL).
Vít
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
