I'll bite. One popular bundle people might relate to is to bundle the rails gems together, as a demonstration.
BTW, does/will your solution work for gems with components that get compiled at installation time? Probably not a showstopper though,. Gembundle still seems a good idea. Nic On 3/21/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/20/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi-- > > A few days back I brought up some ideas for dealing with > multi-packages. This evening I sat down and put to together a little > tool to handle just that: gembundle. > > The ideas is simple. Lets say I have a couple of gems: hello_world.gem > and adios_world.gem. > > % gembundle build tryme hello_world-1.0.0.gem adios_world-1.0.0.gem > > This creates a tar.gz file called, tryme.gembundle which simply > contains the two listed gems, Then... > > % gembundle install tryme.gembundle > Successfully installed hello_world, version 1.0.0 > Successfully installed adios_world, version 1.0.0 > > The intsall command just copies the bundle to a temp location, unpacks > it and installs the contained gems (with the -y option). > > That's it. > > Of course, my script is just a quick prototype --I'm shelling out for > all the tar and gem stuff. And it doesn't support some features like > remote access for grabbing gems to bundle. But hopefully it doesn't > matter b/c I wanted to see if others would approve of this > functionality being incorporated into RubyGems itself. It's pretty > straightforward. It would just mean adding a "bundle" command to the > gem CLI and allowing the installer to recognize a bundle vs a regular > gem,such that '.gem' could still be used instead '.gembundle'. > > So what is it good for? It gives large application developers > breathing room to use vendor gems more freely. Per my explanation in > my last post, installing a gem that has many dependencies can be > off-putting. Not only does the administrator have to consider each > dependency, but ensuring the right versions of each can be daunting as > well. Gembundles take care these concerns. And since a bundle simply > contains regular gems it works seamlessly with the current design. > > What do you think? No response? T. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
-- Dr Nic Williams http://www.drnicwilliams.com - Ruby/Rails/Javascript/Web2.0 skype: nicwilliams (p) +61 7 3102 3237 (Finds me anywhere in the world, via Skype) (m) +46 737 533 525 (Swedish mobile) (f) +61 7 3305 7572 (sends fax to my email) Björnsonsgatan 153, 16 844 Bromma, Sweden
_______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
