On 3/23/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/23/07, Eric Hodel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why not release it as a separate gem, let it develop for a while, and
> > if people use it, it can be included in RubyGems at a future date?

> > Bundling with RubyGems is going to reduce opportunities for rapid
> > improvement.
> Okay. Well I can do that. It's pretty drop-dead simple though. Do you
> have any reason to suspect it's a bad idea?

Yeah; it's shelling out for tar. Use Archive::Tar::Minitar instead and
then you only depend on RubyGems and can script that appropriately
(see Patrick's questions recently on automating Gems).

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.halostatue.ca/
               * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.halostatue.ca/feed/
               * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to