On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Daniel Berger <djber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Luis Lavena wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> >> The following are the results of RubyGems revision 2193 running >> against MinGW and VC6 versions of Ruby. >> >> http://pastie.org/466833 > > Looks like the one failure either needs to be skipped or the test itself > needs to be adjusted. >
I see VC6 skips 6 tests while MinGW only 4, maybe there is a problem with the platform evaluation? -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exupéry _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
