Luis Lavena wrote:
Hey guys,

The following are the results of RubyGems revision 2193 running
against MinGW and VC6 versions of Ruby.

http://pastie.org/466833

Looks like the one failure either needs to be skipped or the test itself needs to be adjusted.

Regards,

Dan
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to