On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Aaron Patterson <aa...@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote: > I don't think this is a problem rubygems necessarily needs to solve. As > a library writer, why are you including a lib/rails.rb in your gem? Why > not "lib/a_gem/rails.rb"?
Ara, do you have any examples of gems that are busted by the current behavior? I assume you've run in to a few. ~ j. _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
