On 19 Oct 2009, at 19:48, John Barnette wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Aaron Patterson
<aa...@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:
I don't think this is a problem rubygems necessarily needs to
solve. As
a library writer, why are you including a lib/rails.rb in your
gem? Why
not "lib/a_gem/rails.rb"?
Ara, do you have any examples of gems that are busted by the current
behavior? I assume you've run in to a few.
I patched aasm not that long ago for this reason, it was conflicting
with state_machine
~ j.
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
