On Jan 6, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Luis Lavena wrote: > C:\Users\Luis>gem test rubygems-test --backtrace > ERROR: While executing gem ... (NameError) > uninitialized constant Fcntl::F_SETFD > > C:/Users/Luis/.gem/ruby/x86-mingw32/1.8/gems/rubygems-test-0.2.0/lib/open4-vendor.rb:20:in > `popen4' > <snip>
This is definitely not intended. I'm guessing its the vendored open4 that we're using to support 1.8 elsewhere, and probably just needs a special case in the procs we use to abstract the IO portion of the system. You can see in /lib/rubygems/commands/test_command.rb we case through a couple of scenarios to support 1.8, 1.9, JRuby, etc. I imagine we just need a case that basically says, "if 1.8 and on windows, use the 1.9 version", but I might be off on that. If not we can probably combine the procs I use to build out the reader into something cohesive. > Above example doesn't pass the test. Tried cloning rubygems-test and > running rake test there: > > C:\Users\Luis\Projects\oss\rubygems-test>rake test > (in C:/Users/Luis/Projects/oss/rubygems-test) > C:/Users/Luis/Tools/Ruby/ruby-1.8.7-p330-i386-mingw32/bin/ruby.exe -w > -Ilib;bin;test;. -e 'require "rubygems"; require "test/unit"; require > "test/test_execute.rb"' -- > ./test/helper.rb:57: warning: method redefined; discarding old setup > Loaded suite -e > Started > > ----- This test is interactive ----- > > ...Successfully uninstalled test-gem-0.0.0 > ERROR: Could not find gem test-gem (0.0.0) > .Successfully uninstalled test-gem-0.0.0 > ERROR: Couldn't find rakefile -- this gem cannot be tested. Aborting. > Successfully uninstalled test-gem-0.0.0 > ... > Finished in 2.424139 seconds. > > 7 tests, 13 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors > > The ERROR is the part I'm not confident with :-P That ERROR you see there is actually intended, it's testing the system itself, including the failure cases. > I would like to know what is required from the Windows side (if you > heard of problems beyond the ones I shown above). There's a circular require issue (this is what I was talking about in that email) in 1.9 mingw that I haven't figured out yet, but I'll keep hacking on it, I need to learn more about windows ruby anyhow. :) > I can spare some hours this weekend to hack some solutions if required. That would be *awesome*. Thank you! -Erik _______________________________________________ Rubygems-developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
