On Feb 22, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:41 , James Tucker wrote:
>
>> The following must be considered a bug:
>>
>>>> require 'rubygems'
>> => true
>>>> Gem.activate('rails', '< 3.0.0.beta')
>> => true
>>>> require 'active_support/ordered_hash'
>> Gem::LoadError: Unable to activate activesupport-3.0.4, but rails-2.3.9.pre
>> depends on activesupport (= 2.3.9.pre, runtime)
>> from /opt/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:265:in `activate'
>> from /opt/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:198:in `try_activate'
>> from /opt/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
>> `require'
>> from (irb):3
>>>> Gem.activate('activesupport', '2.3.9.pre')
>> => true
>>>> require 'active_support/ordered_hash'
>> => true
>>
>> Replication environment is the same as my last.
>
> This I can repro:
>
> 10020 % ruby -Ilib -rubygems -e 'Gem.activate("rails", "< 3.0.0.beta");
> require "active_support/ordered_hash"'
> ./lib/rubygems.rb:265:in `activate': Unable to activate activesupport-3.0.4,
> but rails-2.3.9.pre depends on activesupport (= 2.3.9.pre, runtime)
> (Gem::LoadError)
> from ./lib/rubygems.rb:198:in `try_activate'
> from ./lib/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
> from -e:1
>
> and I'm looking into it now...
Verified against the real use case and you got my test passing.
Many thanks!
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
