On Feb 23, 2011, at 00:47 , James Tucker wrote:
>> This I can repro:
>>
>> 10020 % ruby -Ilib -rubygems -e 'Gem.activate("rails", "< 3.0.0.beta");
>> require "active_support/ordered_hash"'
>> ./lib/rubygems.rb:265:in `activate': Unable to activate activesupport-3.0.4,
>> but rails-2.3.9.pre depends on activesupport (= 2.3.9.pre, runtime)
>> (Gem::LoadError)
>> from ./lib/rubygems.rb:198:in `try_activate'
>> from ./lib/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
>> from -e:1
>>
>> and I'm looking into it now...
>
> Verified against the real use case and you got my test passing.
>
> Many thanks!
No. I never got your test passing. I verified that the test would never pass on
1.5 or 1.6 and removed it. I think a majority of the fault lies with the test
infrastructure. We apparently don't have a good/clean way of setting up this
type of test very well... tho I don't see why we don't by this time.
We should revisit this deficiency for 1.7.
_______________________________________________
Rubygems-developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
Rubygems-developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
