On 12/10/11 20:29, Jon wrote:
> Is it your perspective that the field is mandatory and the field's value must 
> be something other than one of the following?
> 
>   s.license = ""
>     - or -
>   s.licenses = []

You can put s.license = "Proprietary", s.license = "Non-commercial" or
something similar if you don't want to use common FOSS license(s).

> If the field is not present and "correct", do you believe things similar to 
> `gem build mygem.gemspec` should refuse to create a .gem?

Yes. I think gem build foo.gemspec should refuse to create a gem when
both license and licenses are empty. (We might want to check also on gem
push, but that's probably not necessary).

-- 
Best Regards / S pozdravom,

Pavol RUSNAK                                       SUSE LINUX, s.r.o
openSUSE Boosters Team                            Lihovarska 1060/12
PGP 0xA6917144                                         19000 Praha 9
prusnak[at]opensuse.org                               Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
RubyGems-Developers mailing list
http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems
RubyGems-Developers@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers

Reply via email to