rubygems-developers  

Messages by Thread

• No external deps on Rubygems.org? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Nick Quaranto
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Erik Hollensbe
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Nick Quaranto
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Erik Hollensbe
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Evan Phoenix
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Nick Quaranto
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Metadata (Was: No external deps on Rubygems.org?) Eric Hodel
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Luis Lavena
  • Re: No external deps on Rubygems.org? Charles Oliver Nutter
• rubygems 'developers' site Nick Quaranto
• Make license/licenses field mandatory Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Steve Klabnik
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jim Weirich
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Nick Quaranto
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jon
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jeremy Hinegardner
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jon
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jay Feldblum
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jon
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Nick Quaranto
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Luis Lavena
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jay Feldblum
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Eric Hodel
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jay Feldblum
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Eric Hodel
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jay Feldblum
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jon
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Christian Höltje
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Eric Hodel
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Marcus Rueckert
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Erik Hollensbe
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Marcus Rueckert
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Ryan Davis
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Marcus Rueckert
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Ryan Davis
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Alex Chaffee
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Eric Hodel
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Alex Chaffee
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Eric Hodel
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Pavol Rusnak
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Eric Hodel
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Jay Feldblum
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Eric Hodel
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Nick Quaranto
  • Re: Make license/licenses field mandatory Pavol Rusnak
• support queue spam Nick Quaranto
• ANN: isolate version 3.2.0 has been released! Ryan Davis
• [ANN] rubygems 1.8.10 Released Ryan Davis
• [ANN] rubygems-update 1.8.9 Released Eric Hodel
• github members Ryan Davis
• [ANN] rubygems-update 1.8.8 Released Eric Hodel
• [ANN] rubygems-update 1.8.7 Released Eric Hodel
• RubyGems 1.8.7 release and Ruby 1.9.3 Eric Hodel
  • Re: RubyGems 1.8.7 release and Ruby 1.9.3 Luis Lavena
  • Re: RubyGems 1.8.7 release and Ruby 1.9.3 Eric Hodel
  • Re: RubyGems 1.8.7 release and Ruby 1.9.3 Jon
  • Re: RubyGems 1.8.7 release and Ruby 1.9.3 Eric Hodel
  • Re: RubyGems 1.8.7 release and Ruby 1.9.3 Luis Lavena
• rubygems organization repo reorganization Nick Quaranto
• [ANN] rubygems-update 1.8.6 Released Eric Hodel
• ← Subject prefix is now gone Eric Hodel
• [Rubygems-developers] Using rubygems for another language/platform Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Using rubygems for another language/platform Eric Hodel
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Using rubygems for another language/platform Nick Quaranto
• [Rubygems-developers] [ANN] isolate 3.1.1 Released Ryan Davis
• [Rubygems-developers] platform.rb regex concerns Daniel Berger
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] platform.rb regex concerns Ryan Davis
• [Rubygems-developers] Searching for files among gems Trans
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29316 ] ruby_code case not handled: Regexp noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29316 ] ruby_code case not handled: Regexp noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29316 ] ruby_code case not handled: Regexp noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29316 ] ruby_code case not handled: Regexp noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29313 ] Installer outputs BOM from History.txt noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29313 ] Installer outputs BOM from History.txt noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] RubyGems is taking pwd/gems as source of gems? Luis Lavena
• [Rubygems-developers] universal vs x86 Daniel Berger
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] universal vs x86 Luis Lavena
• [Rubygems-developers] Gemspec does not allow an empty require_paths list Aaron Patterson
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gemspec does not allow an empty require_paths list Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gemspec does not allow an empty require_paths list James Tucker
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gemspec does not allow an empty require_paths list Aaron Patterson
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Gemspec does not allow an empty require_paths list Eric Hodel
• [Rubygems-developers] test (sorry) Eric Hodel
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29300 ] gem and require behavior changed noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29300 ] gem and require behavior changed noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29300 ] gem and require behavior changed noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29300 ] gem and require behavior changed noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29300 ] gem and require behavior changed noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] --test option removed from check command? Conery John
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] --test option removed from check command? Luis Lavena
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] --test option removed from check command? Conery John
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] --test option removed from check command? Eric Hodel
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] --test option removed from check command? Erik Hollensbe
• [Rubygems-developers] Huge Trans
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Huge James Tucker
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Huge Evan Phoenix
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Patches-29269 ] Gem.set_paths fails on Etc.getpwuid.uid when running chrooted noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] no more redundant warnings David Chelimsky
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] no more redundant warnings Evan Phoenix
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29266 ] undefined method `name' for " actionmailer" :String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29266 ] undefined method `name' for " actionmailer" :String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29266 ] undefined method `name' for " actionmailer" :String noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29266 ] undefined method `name' for "actionmailer":String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29266 ] undefined method `name' for "actionmailer":String noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list Ryan Davis
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list Luis Lavena
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list Steve Klabnik
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list James Tucker
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list Steve Klabnik
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list James Tucker
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list Eric Hodel
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list Luis Lavena
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] github issues and the mailing list James Tucker
• [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Eric Hodel
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Loren Segal
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed James Tucker
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Eric Hodel
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Eric Hodel
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Jon
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Ryan Davis
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Documentation generation has changed Eric Hodel
• [Rubygems-developers] RbConfig.datadir deprecation and Gem.datadir TODO comment Luis Lavena
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-27975 ] " gemspec is valid" has different meaning locally versus at submit time. noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-27975 ] " gemspec is valid" has different meaning locally versus at submit time. noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] moving to github issues Ryan Davis
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] moving to github issues Luis Lavena
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] moving to github issues Steve Klabnik
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] moving to github issues Ryan Davis
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] moving to github issues Ryan Davis
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29259 ] IO#tty? is not broken on Windows (MRI trunk) noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29259 ] IO#tty? is not broken on Windows (MRI trunk) noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29259 ] IO#tty? is not broken on Windows (MRI trunk) noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29259 ] IO#tty? is not broken on Windows (MRI trunk) noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29258 ] GEM_HOME=xxx gem install rake installs doco wrong noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29258 ] GEM_HOME=xxx gem install rake installs doco wrong noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29258 ] GEM_HOME=xxx gem install rake installs doco wrong noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29257 ] Massively Duplicated Deprecation Warnings noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29257 ] Massively Duplicated Deprecation Warnings noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29257 ] Massively Duplicated Deprecation Warnings noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] Is #require_paths required? Trans
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Is #require_paths required? Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Is #require_paths required? Trans
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29253 ] Gem plugins + gem install -i causes activation errors noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29253 ] Gem plugins + gem install -i causes activation errors noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29253 ] Gem plugins + gem install -i causes activation errors noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Patches-29250 ] Please backport r31914 and r31915 from Ruby trunk noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29249 ] Can't downgrade to 1.37 from 1.8.5 noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29249 ] Can't downgrade to 1.37 from 1.8.5 noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29249 ] Can't downgrade to 1.37 from 1.8.5 noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29216 ] Bogus " WARNING You don't have X in your PATH" with --user-install --bindir options set noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29216 ] Bogus " WARNING You don't have X in your PATH" with --user-install --bindir options set noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ANN] rubygems-update 1.8.5 Released Evan Phoenix
• [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Uwe Kubosch
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Uwe Kubosch
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Uwe Kubosch
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Uwe Kubosch
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Eric Hodel
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Uwe Kubosch
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Luis Lavena
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Releasing gems for ruboto (JRuby on Android) Uwe Kubosch
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Feature Requests-29244 ] Consider moving to Github Issues noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Feature Requests-29241 ] There should be a central source for RubyGems announcements (blog?) noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Feature Requests-29243 ] Write up a guide / documentation about the plugin system noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Feature Requests-29242 ] Add pages to rubygems.org about contributing / getting help noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Feature Requests-29240 ] Rename `gem sandbox remove` to `gem sandbox uninstall` noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29236 ] native extension installation exposes a back door through which gems can be installed with no management noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29232 ] undefined method `specifications' for "...path":String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29232 ] undefined method `specifications' for "...path":String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29232 ] undefined method `specifications' for "...path":String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29232 ] undefined method `specifications' for "...path":String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29232 ] undefined method `specifications' for "...path":String noreply
  • [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Bugs-29232 ] undefined method `specifications' for "...path":String noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Feature Requests-29231 ] gem install *.gem should do topo sort noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] [ rubygems-Feature Requests-29230 ] gem list and gem install should take --yaml flag noreply
• [Rubygems-developers] Proposal for signing gems Grant Olson
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Proposal for signing gems Evan Phoenix
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Proposal for signing gems Grant Olson
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Proposal for signing gems Luis Lavena
  • Re: [Rubygems-developers] Proposal for signing gems Evan Phoenix

• Earlier messages
• Later messages