On Oct 15, 2011, at 06:12 , Marcus Rueckert wrote: > On 2011-10-14 14:28:20 -0700, Ryan Davis wrote: >> On Oct 12, 2011, at 06:54 , Pavol Rusnak wrote: >> >>> I'd like to propose making license/licenses field mandatory. >> >> I'm not opposed to adding a package-time warning if the license field >> is not filled out but making it mandatory right off the bat is a >> mistake that I'm not willing to make at this time. In the future we >> can tighten the belt and make the field mandatory. >> >> As for all the other suggestions saying there needs to be enforcement >> at multiple levels, absolutely not. This is out of scope for the OP's >> proposal and out of scope for what we're trying to do at this time. > > well if you start with the spdx tags right from the beginning you save > us all the problems with migrating to a defined set later on.
Patches welcome. _______________________________________________ RubyGems-Developers mailing list http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubygems RubyGems-Developers@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygems-developers
