Non-trivial is in the eye of the beholder, however here are some examples of issues which have been closed in the last few days as wontfix or worksforme, but which do not provide a test to verify.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2851 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4415 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6572 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5455 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5688 In all of these cases the closure is based on someone stating that they do not see this behavior, or that they have tested it, but there is no way to verify their tests. All I'm suggesting is that by providing a test case anyone would be able to prove it on their own environment, including the original author of the issue should they still be experiencing the problem. V/r Anthony Eden On 1/24/07, Thijs van der Vossen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2007, at 17:51, Anthony Eden wrote: > > [...] Any thoughts on this? Does this seem like a reasonable thing > > to do? > > Why can't we assume the reporter will come back to re-open the ticket > if he or she feels the ticket should not have been closed? > > Can you give an example of a non-trivial issue that has not been > fixed just because someone closed the ticket for the wrong reason? > > Kind regards, > Thijs van der Vossen > > -- > Fingertips - http://www.fngtps.com > > Phone: +31 (0)6 24204845 > Skype: tvandervossen > > MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > iChat/AOL: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jabber IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- Cell: 808 782-5046 Current Location: Melbourne, FL --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
