On Feb 24, 8:36 am, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2/23/07, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Starting Monday I'll be working for myself and one of the things I'm
> > > looking forward to is working on ActiveRecord more.
>
> > Congratulations, it's a bunch of fun :)
>
> Will the change make the Abstract Adapter really abstract while moving all
> generic SQL to "Abstract SQL Adapter" (which the current concrete adapters
> would subclass instead)? Removing all SQL-specific code from AR::Base would
> also be neat.
>
> That change would make room, for example, an adapter for XML databases in
> the future!
If you go the route of registering components for different adapters
you could support XML based adapters, because query generation would
be contained to the adapters that it supports without having to muck
up ActiveRecord to hack on XML support. I think this would be
possible,
Zach
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
