Pratik wrote: > Oracel Adapter : > # Current maintainer: Michael Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > No point in keeping them in core, as that'll just prolong the > devlopment cycle and bug fixing process. > > So these stuff can probably go under the same roof that we discussed > for ex-rails plugins.
Speaking only for myself, I'd still need svn and Trac hosting. As long as that can be maintained, core vs. non-core doesn't matter as much. Though I guess I'd still be a bit concerned about an under-informed sense that "standard Rails" wouldn't have Oracle compatibility. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
