> Speaking only for myself, I'd still need svn and Trac hosting. As long > as that can be maintained, core vs. non-core doesn't matter as much. > Though I guess I'd still be a bit concerned about an under-informed > sense that "standard Rails" wouldn't have Oracle compatibility.
Well, as it stands adapters basically can't work properly in plugins. So before we looked into extracting the commercial adapters, we'd need to investigate that first :). Hopefully someone implementing a new adapter will take a look at what's required, then we can start thinking about what we do with the less-used adapters. However with an active, hard-working, long-term maintainer, I can't see any downside to keeping oracle around :) -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
