Why not use name of the partial to refer to form object ?
On 9/25/07, Frederick Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I love form_for, but I really hate
>
> <% form_for :person, @person, :url => {...} do |f| %>
> ...
> <%= render :partial => 'form', :locals => {'f' => f}
> ...
> <% end %>
>
> I've been thinking of instead allowing
>
> <% form_for :person, @person, :url => {...} do |f| %>
> ...
> <%= f.partial 'form' %>
> ...
> <% end %>
>
> f.partial would be exactly the same as the previous snippet, just
> making the form builder available in the partial without the hassle
> of :locals => {'f' => f}
> the one thing I'm not sure about is how you pick the name under which
> the form builder should appear in the partial.
>
> Ideally f.partial 'form' would give you something sensible, but I'm
> not sure how you would pick such a default
>
> f.partial 'form', :name => 'f' would work, but then it's almost as
> awkward as :locals => {'f' => f}
>
> Any ideas (or is this one just stupid ?) ?
>
> Fred
>
> >
>
--
Cheers!
- Pratik
http://m.onkey.org
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
