On 25 Sep 2007, at 21:51, Andrew Kaspick wrote: > > I like the idea of taking the partial name as the local name... that's > how things like the :collection partial works already. >
Seems like this one has the people's vote. The one think holding me back would be that this conflicts with the current behaviour of partial (ie the object/collection with the write name materialising). It would be pretty weird to have objects called @something_form, but what if you did want to build up a form by iterating over some collection ? Fred --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
