DHH wrote: > That way we don't bestow "official" status to a group of people with > good intentions who then never get around to actually doing the work > (and at the same time discourage anyone else gunning for the same slot > from getting to work). > > This is especially prudent if this is to be a comparison to Rails > Core. That group has its members picked from people who actually did > something. Not from people who said they would do something. I think > that's a good model to follow.
This sounds very fair... Who's up for it? And what should 'it' be? railsbeginner.com? Neighborhood Watch for the wiki? Something else? Either way let's get organized. Suggestion for a name: 'Ruby on Rails: Documentation Taskforce'. Well, anyway, let's agree on one and then create at least a google group to get things together. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
