There is already a considerable group of us laboring on documentation. We have a Basecamp if you'd like access, and a mailing list (I think; if not, we need one).
That goes for anyone else also. :) --Jeremy On Jan 4, 2008 5:09 PM, Anthony Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > DHH wrote: > > That way we don't bestow "official" status to a group of people with > > good intentions who then never get around to actually doing the work > > (and at the same time discourage anyone else gunning for the same slot > > from getting to work). > > > > This is especially prudent if this is to be a comparison to Rails > > Core. That group has its members picked from people who actually did > > something. Not from people who said they would do something. I think > > that's a good model to follow. > > This sounds very fair... Who's up for it? And what should 'it' be? > railsbeginner.com? Neighborhood Watch for the wiki? Something else? > Either way let's get organized. Suggestion for a name: 'Ruby on Rails: > Documentation Taskforce'. Well, anyway, let's agree on one and then > create at least a google group to get things together. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > > -- http://www.jeremymcanally.com/ My books: Ruby in Practice http://www.manning.com/mcanally/ My free Ruby e-book http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/ My blogs: http://www.mrneighborly.com/ http://www.rubyinpractice.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
