On 14 Apr 2008, at 13:29, Frederick Cheung wrote:
> > On 11 Apr 2008, at 23:25, Michael Koziarski wrote: > >> >>> Why is it not a case of just removing the "if mysql" bits ? I'm >>> happy >>> to spend some time looking at this but I don't think I get what's to >>> be done. >> >> That's about all there is to it, but after you remove it you have to >> run the tests, and catch any differences (implicit or otherwise) >> between the schema.rb definition and the schema.sql. I've put the current version of this patch on trac: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/11598 Right now mysql, postgres and sqlite3 are happy. The databases I don't have access to/am clueless about are probably unhappy. Fred --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
