Weird, I've never worked on any project that had a numericality requirement not met by vno.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Trejkaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Aaron Patterson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I'd rather not have these types of validations in core as I've never > > worked at two places that had the same validation rules. > > Quite by coincidence, the same is true for validates_numericality_of. > Maybe we should pull that out to a gem too. > > TX > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
