That's it. I completely agree with Rodrigo.
--
LAILSON BANDEIRA
http://lailsonbandeira.com/


On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Ben Munat <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 Both to including validates_as_email in core and that that regex is a
> joke.
>
> Ben
>
>
> On 2/11/11 10:38 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
>
>> Em 11-02-2011 15:20, Rainer Frey escreveu:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Similar cases can be made for URLs.
>>>
>>> So yes, the fomat of email addresses and URLs may be quite different
>>> in different applications.
>>>
>>
>> That doesn't mean that a gem should come first. DDH became famous among
>> other things for his "opinated software" policy. By the way, I've been
>> enjoyed a lot his recent book "Rework", although I've not finished it
>> yet. Highly recommended. As well as José Valim's excellent book
>> "Crafting Rails Application".
>>
>> Back to the subject, after the free merchandise, what I'm saying is that
>> this is a very common requirement and most developers don't (shouldn't?)
>> care that much about e-mail format. At least for 90% of the
>> applications. So, I don't see any reasons why not to include some
>> "validates_email_of" helper. It doesn't need to solve all cases. It can
>> have some options for specifying some regular expression or some lambda
>> for verifying the e-mail format in case someone is really worried about
>> it. It can even be customized in a global configuration per
>> project/engine/mountable application. There could be some pre-defined
>> options specified by symbol like :rfc_compliant,
>> :performant_verification, etc.
>>
>> I just don't buy the idea to make this more difficult than it should be.
>> It is much simpler to evolute and understand better the validations
>> after they are provided on rails core distribution. Also, in the
>> beginning, there were lots of philosophies about Rails, like the 80/20
>> principle. No body talks about this anymore... In every web application
>> with a user sign up feature, there will be an e-mail validation. This is
>> probably over 90% of the web applications built with Rails. Even so,
>> this will require all of these developers to replicate the logic to
>> validate e-mail. Most of them will just extract this one from Rails
>> documentation:
>>
>> validates_format_of :email, :with =>
>> /\A([^@\s]+)@((?:[-a-z0-9]+\.)+[a-z]{2,})\Z/i
>>
>> That is because, this is usually the first thing written in a new
>> application that requires a user to log in. In this stage, no one is
>> willing to invest any time on the e-mail validation rule. Usually this
>> will only happen if some customer complaint about not being able to
>> register himself because the system is rejecting his e-mail.
>>
>> For my applications, I usually don't care very much about the format
>> because of the way I handle the registration part. The user doesn't
>> input any information in the register form, except his e-mail address.
>> Then, he is informed that there were sent instructions for continuing
>> the register process to his e-mail and he'll continue to register
>> following a link on the e-mail. That way I can know for sure that the
>> e-mail is valid.
>>
>> So, I think that even if not perfect, Rails should not wait for any gem
>> before supporting e-mail and URL validations built-in, even though I
>> have a feeling that it won't happen based on what I've being observed
>> from the core-team point of view.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Rodrigo.
>>
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.

Reply via email to