Oh, there isn't. The question is really whether the current Arel library is still useful as a standalone library (could be made useful without too much bloat) or whether Arel-standalone should be developed separately.
Arthur On 26/04/11 22:05, Jason King wrote: > I don't see that the use case is that compelling for the majority of > Rails apps . > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Arthur Taylor > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Aaron, all, > > Did anyone have any strong feelings about the following feature - > is it > something that it's going to be possible to get included (possibly > in a > prettied up form), or am I better forking / monkey-patching? > > The idea with the placeholders is that you could have one query > which > > serializes differently to SQL (or through any of the visitors) > > depending on the dynamic value of the placeholders. The effect I > want > > (and am using in my local repo) is not to have to define the > values of > > all the query terms at query build time: > > > > @placeholders = { :username => "bob" } > > > > query = > > > > @users.project(@users[:id]).where(@users[:name].eq(Arel::Nodes::Placeholder.new(:username, > > @placeholders))) > > query.to_sql => "SELECT `users`.`id` FROM `users` WHERE > > `users`.`name` = 'bob'" > > > > @placeholders[:username] = "adam" > > query.to_sql => "SELECT `users`.`id` FROM `users` WHERE > `users`.`name` > > = 'adam'" > > > > Make sense? Sound useful? I'm not sure that's the most elegant > API in > > the world (in fact I'm pretty sure it's not), but I'm open to > > suggestions as to pretty ways to achieve the same thing. > > > The other design I considered would be: > > @placeholders = Arel::Placeholders.new(:username => "bob") > > query = > > @users.project(@users[:id]).where(@users[:name].eq(@placeholders.for_key(:username))) > query.to_sql => "SELECT `users`.`id` FROM `users` WHERE > `users`.`name` > = 'bob'" > > @placeholders.update(:username => "adam") > query.to_sql => "SELECT `users`.`id` FROM `users` WHERE > `users`.`name` = > 'adam'" > > which seems a little more elegant. > > Thanks, > > Arthur > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > <mailto:rubyonrails-core%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
