+1 for evergreen Sent from my iPhone
On 1 Sep 2011, at 16:45, Jonas Nicklas <[email protected]> wrote: > Definitely +1 for Jasmine > > It's easily the best test framework for JavaScript. I wrote a wrapper > around it called Evergreen, which has gained a little traction. You > should check it out for inspiration I think, since it does a lot of > things very differently than most other similar libraries. I think > it's far superior to e.g. the jasmine gem. > > It doesn't yet work with the asset pipeline, since I've been holding > off for the official Rails 3.1 release. So asset pipeline support will > be there soon. > > I'm not really campaigning for this to be included in Rails, honestly > I think I prefer it as a separate library, but if you do go down that > route, at least check out the concepts around which Evergreen is > built. I think it has a much better out-of-the-box experience than > pretty much anything else out there. > > https://github.com/jnicklas/evergreen > > /Jonas > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
