I think the appropriate question to ask is "of Rails developers unit testing their javascript, who is *not* using Jasmine"
I definitely get the impression that * most people are not unit testing their javascript application code, instead relying on integration tests to catch errors * among those who do, jasmine is the most frequently used. I happen to use Jasmine, but I'm not particuarly wild about it. I'd be interested in what over people use, but I suspect Jasmine is it. Although there are a *lot* of javascript testing libraries, there isn't much consensus among javascripters which one(s) to use. As a result, they all suffer from the lack of support and tooling. Each library seems to be missing key features. Major framework support of one of them (Jasmine or not) would hopefully catapult one to the forefront. +1 for any damn thing. -Trek On Thursday, September 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jonas Nicklas wrote: > Definitely +1 for Jasmine > > It's easily the best test framework for JavaScript. I wrote a wrapper > around it called Evergreen, which has gained a little traction. You > should check it out for inspiration I think, since it does a lot of > things very differently than most other similar libraries. I think > it's far superior to e.g. the jasmine gem. > > It doesn't yet work with the asset pipeline, since I've been holding > off for the official Rails 3.1 release. So asset pipeline support will > be there soon. > > I'm not really campaigning for this to be included in Rails, honestly > I think I prefer it as a separate library, but if you do go down that > route, at least check out the concepts around which Evergreen is > built. I think it has a much better out-of-the-box experience than > pretty much anything else out there. > > https://github.com/jnicklas/evergreen > > /Jonas > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
