On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:25 -0800, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> Anyway, these are my thoughts.  Input is definitely welcome, but I
> really think this is something we need to change.

I'm definitely not keen on option 2.

Option 1 I could live with, though I'd like to still keep the Markdown
format.

Another alternative is to actually just keep the stable release
changelogs in the stable branch. So changelog entries between 3.1.0 and
3.1.1 would only exist in the 3-1-stable branch. Then we wouldn't have
to fuss about keep master in sync.

-- 
http://jonathanleighton.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to