On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 07:05:34PM +0000, Jon Leighton wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 10:25 -0800, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> > Anyway, these are my thoughts.  Input is definitely welcome, but I
> > really think this is something we need to change.
> 
> I'm definitely not keen on option 2.
> 
> Option 1 I could live with, though I'd like to still keep the Markdown
> format.
> 
> Another alternative is to actually just keep the stable release
> changelogs in the stable branch. So changelog entries between 3.1.0 and
> 3.1.1 would only exist in the 3-1-stable branch. Then we wouldn't have
> to fuss about keep master in sync.

I don't understand this solution.  You're proposing no changelog on
master?

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

Attachment: pgptp5DYY3RKp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to