The Rails on Rack documentation is still using the "ActionController::Dispatcher" class but it no longer exists, I can update the documentation, I just wanted to discuss what's the best way to do it, I've tested with "run Rails.application" as well as with "run MyAppName::Application" (just like the generated config.ru file does it), what do you think?
So the documentation could end up like this: Rails.application or MyAppName::Application is the primary Rack application object of a Rails application. Any Rack compliant web server should be using Rails.application or MyAppName::Application object to serve a Rails application. There's another thing. Just after the text above you can find this: rails server does the basic job of creating a Rack::Builder object and starting the webserver. This is Rails’ equivalent of Rack’s rackup script. Which is not true, at least it doesn't do it directly, what it does is: 1. It creates a class: class Server < ::Rack::Server 2. The Server#start method calls "super" 3. Rack creates the Rack::Builder object am I wrong? So, what do you think about those changes? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/zrJJNzSTdWMJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
