I made an initial pull request already: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/6454.
What do you guys think? On Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:23:10 AM UTC-5, Rafael Magaña wrote: > > The Rails on Rack documentation is still using the > "ActionController::Dispatcher" class but it no longer exists, I can update > the documentation, I just wanted to discuss what's the best way to do it, > I've tested with "run Rails.application" as well as with "run > MyAppName::Application" (just like the generated config.ru file does it), > what do you think? > > So the documentation could end up like this: > > Rails.application or MyAppName::Application is the primary Rack > application object of a Rails application. Any Rack compliant web server > should be using Rails.application or MyAppName::Application object to > serve a Rails application. > > > There's another thing. Just after the text above you can find this: > > rails server does the basic job of creating a Rack::Builder object and > starting the webserver. This is Rails’ equivalent of Rack’s rackup script. > > > Which is not true, at least it doesn't do it directly, what it does is: > > 1. It creates a class: class Server < ::Rack::Server > 2. The Server#start method calls "super" > 3. Rack creates the Rack::Builder object > > am I wrong? > > So, what do you think about those changes? > > Thanks in advance. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/6NA_qEnVtY4J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
