Wow yep! I'hope this prosperes ... I'm not sure next step for consolidation on RoR version. Thanks Loz
2012/6/21 Jonathan Lozinski <[email protected]> > I have raised a pull request which gets this started, though there's > feedback required for sure: > > https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/6817 > > > On 21 June 2012 18:35, daniel2d2art <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes I think some chainity_operator method like you say, can works ok too. >> >> >> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:27:51 PM UTC+2, mrloz wrote: >>> >>> We have wanted similar, and resorted to getting where's out of arel. >>> >>> I thought about the following syntax: >>> >>> >>> MyModel.somescope.or(**something_which_is_a_scope_**chain_too) >>> >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 21 Jun 2012, at 15:57, daniel2d2art <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, I'want to introduce this discussion (I'm looking for similar >>> here, but don't found it) >>> >>> Actually the scopes chainity is glued with "AND" operator. >>> Some times we need to chain the same scope implemented method using both >>> "OR" or cases with "AND" operators. But It's not possible because chainity >>> does only with "AND" operator. If you need "OR" conditions you need to >>> re-implement explicit method to do it. >>> In the interests of DRY, *what you think to pass a "chainity_operator" >>> param in chain scopes??* by default can be set to "AND", but can be >>> changed for an "OR" if need. Then we can reuse the sames scopes on >>> differents combinations. >>> Or may a chainity_operator method that can be chained with scoped where >>> methods? >>> I'm not sure if possible or if it break any AR-AREL architecture. >>> >>> Best >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/** >>> msg/rubyonrails-core/-/**LFQWTRHdM8EJ<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/LFQWTRHdM8EJ> >>> . >>> To post to this group, send email to >>> rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.**com<[email protected]> >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> rubyonrails-core+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<[email protected]> >>> . >>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** >>> group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en> >>> . >>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/vMihSC-FuxgJ. >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > -- Daniel Vázquez SICONET (A Bull Group Company) Torre Agbar. Avda. Diagonal, 211 - planta 23 08018 - Barcelona telf: + 34 93 2272727 (Ext. 2952) fax: + 34 93 2272728 www.bull.es - www.siconet.es [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
