Yes, I think so too On 22 jun, 18:20, Jonathan Lozinski <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe that the arel implementation leads to brackets around left > and right sides of the or. This can be checked by using my branch and > doing .to_sql on any scope chain produced. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 22 Jun 2012, at 17:05, daniel2d2art <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We're following to using disjunction on two or more chained scopes. > > This scopes can continue use custom logical conditions. Normal would > > be to use parentheses between on query. > > In pro of DRY some cases we need use scopes conected as AND but in > > another cases we need to use OR connections. Rails only do scope chain > > with AND. Some times you need to rewritte a full functionality of one > > or more scoper only for use OR connections. > > > On 22 jun, 04:05, Andrew Kaspick <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Maybe I've missed it, but how do you define precedence between the > >> usual AND's and now OR's? Chaining a bunch of AND's will always > >> results in the same result, but add OR to the mix and now you're > >> complicating things unless you're a lot more explicit with the > >> conditions. > > >> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Daniel Vázquez <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> Wow yep! I'hope this prosperes ... I'm not sure next step for > >>> consolidation > >>> on RoR version. > >>> Thanks Loz > > >>> 2012/6/21 Jonathan Lozinski <[email protected]> > > >>>> I have raised a pull request which gets this started, though there's > >>>> feedback required for sure: > > >>>>https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/6817 > > >>>> On 21 June 2012 18:35, daniel2d2art <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> Yes I think some chainity_operator method like you say, can works ok > >>>>> too. > > >>>>> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:27:51 PM UTC+2, mrloz wrote: > > >>>>>> We have wanted similar, and resorted to getting where's out of arel. > > >>>>>> I thought about the following syntax: > > >>>>>> MyModel.somescope.or(something_which_is_a_scope_chain_too) > > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > > >>>>>> On 21 Jun 2012, at 15:57, daniel2d2art <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Hi guys, I'want to introduce this discussion (I'm looking for similar > >>>>>> here, but don't found it) > > >>>>>> Actually the scopes chainity is glued with "AND" operator. > >>>>>> Some times we need to chain the same scope implemented method using > >>>>>> both > >>>>>> "OR" or cases with "AND" operators. But It's not possible because > >>>>>> chainity > >>>>>> does only with "AND" operator. If you need "OR" conditions you need to > >>>>>> re-implement explicit method to do it. > >>>>>> In the interests of DRY, what you think to pass a "chainity_operator" > >>>>>> param in chain scopes?? by default can be set to "AND", but can be > >>>>>> changed > >>>>>> for an "OR" if need. Then we can reuse the sames scopes on differents > >>>>>> combinations. > >>>>>> Or may a chainity_operator method that can be chained with scoped where > >>>>>> methods? > >>>>>> I'm not sure if possible or if it break any AR-AREL architecture. > > >>>>>> Best > > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>>>> Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/LFQWTRHdM8EJ. > >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>>>> [email protected]. > >>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > >>>>> -- > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>>> Groups > >>>>> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit > >>>>>https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/vMihSC-FuxgJ. > > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>>> [email protected]. > >>>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > >>>> -- > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>>> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> [email protected]. > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > >>> -- > >>> Daniel Vázquez > >>> SICONET (A Bull Group Company) > >>> Torre Agbar. Avda. Diagonal, 211 - planta 23 > >>> 08018 - Barcelona > >>> telf: + 34 93 2272727 (Ext. 2952) > >>> fax: + 34 93 2272728 > >>>www.bull.es-www.siconet.es > >>> [email protected] > > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >>> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> [email protected]. > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
