I don't know if it is worth. You can use builder.object right now. This can confuse the users with one more way to access the object. I prefer to keep the API simple.
Rafael Mendonça França http://twitter.com/rafaelfranca https://github.com/rafaelfranca On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:33 PM, glaszig <[email protected]> wrote: > hello everybody. > > i think it'd be very convenient to have the builder#object as an optional > second parameter in the block for fields_for, e.g.: > > fields_for(:comments) do |builder, object| > # builder.object === object > end > > my proposal in code: > > https://github.com/glaszig/rails/commit/f22095f0ac120852fff7efc61b6bdf7401b39ad5 > > before i request a pull - what do you think? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/DpEfiDSbYcUJ. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
