I agree with Rafael, this seems unnecessary. On Friday, October 26, 2012 8:39:16 AM UTC-4, Rafael Mendonça França wrote: > > I don't know if it is worth. You can use builder.object right now. This > can confuse the users with one more way to access the object. I prefer to > keep the API simple. > > Rafael Mendonça França > http://twitter.com/rafaelfranca > https://github.com/rafaelfranca > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:33 PM, glaszig <[email protected] > <javascript:>>wrote: > >> hello everybody. >> >> i think it'd be very convenient to have the builder#object as an optional >> second parameter in the block for fields_for, e.g.: >> >> fields_for(:comments) do |builder, object| >> # builder.object === object >> end >> >> my proposal in code: >> >> https://github.com/glaszig/rails/commit/f22095f0ac120852fff7efc61b6bdf7401b39ad5 >> >> before i request a pull - what do you think? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/DpEfiDSbYcUJ. >> To post to this group, send email to >> [email protected]<javascript:> >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-core/-/kabtE1wLiAoJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
