Yeah... well lighttpd as the balancer is crappy anyway. It just doesn't perform well cos there are serious bugs in the proxy system. Apache + mod_proxy_balancer is the way to go.
On 2/8/07, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey Brian, > > I must say that I definitely gleaned a lot of knowledge from your site. I > ended up going with an Apache front to several mongrel processes. This > really is an easy way to deploy. Luckily our last asp app is on it's way > out and I think I'll be able to replace IIS with Apache. I just need to > figure out how to do ssl client certs with it now. > > I had first tried to use Lighttpd as the balancer with your instructions, > but I guess they've changed up the syntax of the configuration file. > > I also found some additional information here: > > > http://brainspl.at/articles/2006/06/12/apache2-2-vhost-template-for-mongrel-clusters > > > > On 2/8/07, Brian Hogan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'll plug my stuff again > > > > http://www.napcs.com/howto/rails/deploy/index.html > > > > And there's a book coming out that will cover this topic shortly. > > > > > > On 2/6/07, Aníbal Rojas < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have run Apache on W2K, it is really easy to install, and stable. > > > Its configuration is the same than linux so it should not be a > > > problem. Putting IIS behind is a very good idea. > > > > > > -- > > > Aníbal Rojas > > > http://www.rubycorner.com > > > http://www.hasmanydevelopers.com > > > > > > On Feb 6, 10:00 am, Robby Russell < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > > Marlon Moyer wrote: > > > > > yes. Aside from ColdFusion and the new RoR apps that I'm > > > creating, > > > > > we're a 100% microsoft shop. Is it possible to run both IIS and > > > Apache > > > > > on the same win32 server? I've never tried that, but as long as > > > it > > > > > wouldn't interfere with the normal IIS operation, I think I could > > > get > > > > > that done. > > > > > > > > > As for the reverse proxy, that would only hit 1 mongrel process > > > right? > > > > > > > > Apache (2.2) has a proxy balancer, so you could proxy several > > > mongrel > > > > instances. > > > > > > > > Here is a blog post that I just found from a quick google search. > > > > > > > > * http://rubyurl.com/z1M > > > > > > > > You'll want to look at these sections. > > > > > > > > <Proxy balancer://mongrel_cluster> > > > > BalancerMemberhttp://127.0.0.1:8000 > > > > BalancerMemberhttp://127.0.0.1:8001 > > > > BalancerMemberhttp://127.0.0.1:8002 > > > > </Proxy> > > > > > > > > and where it's using rewrite to talk to the balancer. > > > > > > > > Putting Apache on port 80 and hiding IIS behind it might be a good > > > > solution for many of your hosting needs in your all-windows > > > environment. > > > > > > > > Good luck! > > > > > > > > Robby > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Robby Russellhttp://www.robbyonrails.com/http://www.planetargon.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > "Tradin' my time for the pay I get, > Livin' on money that I ain't made yet, > Gotta keep going, gotta find my way, > But I'll live for the end of the day." > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
