Yes I think that was a definite problem.  I had tons of files in my tmp
sessions too that I've since cleared.  I'm now switched to ActiveRecordStore
even though I don't yet have any DB access going on.  I'll be reporting back
within minutes my new results.

Raul



On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 12, 1:37 pm, "roller8" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If reducing mongrels improved your score on that box, then it's almost
> certainly using disk based sessions. Fewer mongrels means less disk
> thrashing...
>
> > Tom, I'm also moving to 4 mongrels per CPU to see where that takes
> > me.
>
> That's 4 mongrels per *core*.
>
> > Oh, and lastly, I'm using the hugemem kernel (Linux
> > 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELhugemem).  I wonder if I should try the regular smp
> > kernel for this?  I guess I will try it out anyway.
>
> You're going to get far better results by checking your session config
> and reporting back to us...
>
> If you switch to DB backed sessions with ActiveRecordStore, which
> is very easy, you're likely going to see a major performance increase.
>
> --
> -- Tom Mornini, CTO
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Deploying Rails" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to