OK I'm now running 4 nginx and 16 mongrels (4 per core) and getting 420 to 450 req/sec. So I think that may sound a little more proper for the hardware I'm running then?
On Mar 12, 1:42 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes I think that was a definite problem. I had tons of files in my tmp > sessions too that I've since cleared. I'm now switched to ActiveRecordStore > even though I don't yet have any DB access going on. I'll be reporting back > within minutes my new results. > > Raul > > On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 12, 1:37 pm, "roller8" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If reducing mongrels improved your score on that box, then it's almost > > certainly using disk based sessions. Fewer mongrels means less disk > > thrashing... > > > > Tom, I'm also moving to 4 mongrels per CPU to see where that takes > > > me. > > > That's 4 mongrels per *core*. > > > > Oh, and lastly, I'm using the hugemem kernel (Linux > > > 2.6.9-42.0.10.ELhugemem). I wonder if I should try the regular smp > > > kernel for this? I guess I will try it out anyway. > > > You're going to get far better results by checking your session config > > and reporting back to us... > > > If you switch to DB backed sessions with ActiveRecordStore, which > > is very easy, you're likely going to see a major performance increase. > > > -- > > -- Tom Mornini, CTO --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
