I have tested the same application on the same VPS with mod_rails and mongrel behind nginx. It is more easy to set mod_rails and you should use it for fast deployment. The spawn process was the killer. The second thing that wasn't running was javascript_include_tag with :cache=>true.
Mongrel and nginx was not so difficult to set up, we already do this so many times, and the performance was extraordinary as usual. mod_rails will be the right choice soon but, still waiting. On Sep 21, 5:40 pm, "James H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I run a server at work that uses mod_rails quite successfully. It was > really easy to get started, and seems to be doing great. Something > particularly attractive about mod_rails was that we could easily host > any Sinatra app (we have a few of those running) and Merb apps too. > > James H. > > On Sep 15, 10:11 pm, "Vince W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Does anyone have any recommendations when to use mod_rails vs a > > mongrel/nginx stack? Is one better for low-ram situations or is there a > > clear winner performance-wise regardless of hardware? > > > Thx, > > Vince > > -- > > Posted viahttp://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
