Alex Malinovich wrote: > Just a followup to my earlier comments regarding the instabilities in > mod_rails. Having gotten a few systems up and running with an updated > version of Ruby (one of which is running Ruby Enterprise), we're > seeing much better results overall. (e.g. No more out of control > passenger processes, etc) > > Using a recent build of Ruby along with mod_rails is definitely a > viable solution for folks who prefer to use Apache. We're still not > seeing any substantial performance differences to say that you > *should* use mod_rails instead of nginx+mongrel, but you *can*. :) If > you're more comfortable with Apache, or if you'd like to run a PHP > site on the same machine, using mod_rails is definitely a good a > choice at this point.
Interesting. We've seen a number of people claiming that Phusion Passenger doesn't work very well (= crashing every few hours, processes that get stuck, etc) even though we can't reproduce their problems at all. We haven't considered the possibility that their Ruby interpreter might be the problem. Which Ruby version were you running before, and which version did you upgrade to? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Deploying Rails" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-deployment@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-deployment?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
